Using the international sporting arena to impose political views is contradictory to the spirit of international sports and its goal of being a bridge among cultures.

Using the international sporting arena to impose political views is contradictory to the spirit of international sports and its goal of being a bridge among cultures.

When will countries see that politicizing sporting events not only negatively impacts the image of the event, but impacts the athletes’ long years of training, their opportunities for advancement and the opportunities to present their country in a positive, high profile manner?

The latest country to impose orders on one of their athletes is Tunisia. As the article linked below from ESPN, Tunisia’s Tennis Federation and their Ministry of Youth and Sports ordered Malek Jaziri, ranked 169th in the word in tennis, not to compete again Israeli tennis competitor Amir Weintraub this past Friday in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. There are numerous losers in this match!!!

(Tunisia orders withdrawal vs. Israeli

http://espn.go.com/tennis/story/_/id/9808676/tunisia-orders-player-withdrawal-vs-israeli#comments  )

Tunisia’s tennis champion Malek Jaziri’s competitive career may be adversely affected by not competing in the match which could have helped advance his career and the positive image he has earned thus far for Tunisia.

In January 2011, following the flight of Tunisia’s longtime dictator, Ziabeddine Ben Ali as a result of the initiatives of the country’s youth to achieve freedom, initiatives which inspired democratization drives to other…Tunisia’s image rose to a positive height in the world. This positive image was brief, soon to be eclipsed by Egypt’s struggles and then the subsequent conflicts in other countries’ struggles, from Libya, Syria, Bahrain and elsewhere.

Since January 2011, Tunisia’s economy has been battered. The image of political instability devastated the country’s tourism industry, which provides for nearly 800,000 jobs and some 7% of the country’s GNP. Subsequent incidents which received negative press have continued to make tourism recovery difficult.

Foreign investment in Tunisia’s economy that would yield job creation has all but dried up or departed Tunisia, a result of the political image seen by potential investors of an Islamic led government that has achieved nothing to suggest political stability or a positive environment for foreign, financial investment.

Who within the tennis federation or within the Ministry of Youth and Sports felt that barring Jaziri would serve a useful purpose? At a time when Tunisia must enhance its image, it has by its short-sighted action, again brought diminishment to the country’s image.

Tunisia needs all the positive image it can yield if it wants to aid the country’s economic recovery. Actions such as this ban imposed on Jaziri are not only undiplomatic and short-sighted, but will only serve to benefit those who seem to cling to outdated political tactics.

To paraphrase a now deceased international diplomat, “Tunisia seems to never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity!”

Tunisia’s Democratic Transition. Can it be a lesson to House Republicans?

Too often the words used in the media to describe a political situation are loaded with their own bias; in their interpretation of political events, particularly in how the stories have captured the different pace of events in the Middle East and North Africa since the start of the so called “Arab Spring” in January 2011.

As an American who has been living and traveling within this region for years and meets with Tunisians of all political and socio-economic stripes, I have always been troubled by reports filed after a particularly negative event in this country; a provocative demonstration staged by religious extremists, the assassinations of two leftist political leaders in February and July 2013, and the September 2012 attacks on the US Consul in Benghazi, Libya that resulted in the loss of four American lives, including US Ambassador Chris Stevens, followed three days later with an attack on the U.S. Embassy in Tunis and the neighboring American Cooperative School.

As troubling as these incidents are, anyone who lives in Tunisia and spends time here can tell you that three streets away from where these events took place, life is normal; transportation runs, shops and cafes are open, schools operate and families meet for family gatherings to celebrate lifecycle events. However, this is not what the media captures, rather too often the parachuting in of journalists to cover the event itself, speak to the same circle of politicos in the capital and then make judgments about the entire Revolutionary transition in Tunisia is simply not an objective approach to capturing events on the ground.

During these past days, Tunisian political leaders from across the spectrum have been sitting and negotiating the next stage of the democratization process. Among the discussants include the head of the Islamic party Ennahda, the current holder of plurality in the Constituent Assembly with approximately 42% of the vote, a series of other parties representing either leftist union orientated and also centrist secularists. The purpose of these meetings which are taking place in a spirit not of brotherly love or without some rancor, but in the spirit of trying to find a political process that is healthiest for Tunisia as a country. In that spirit, all members have been voicing their opinions, including some on an argumentative level, but together, find themselves standing and singing Tunisia’s national anthem in an honest show of what they all hold in their hearts…a sense of Tunisian pride.

True, the roadmap to democratization is not easy. When one looks at all the other countries that followed Tunisia’s January 2011 Revolution and were inspired to launch their own revolutions, not one country has been able to retain a path that is showing optimistic signs of peace and democratic freedom. The one exception is the country where it all began, but is seldom covered properly by the media who fly in and then fly out!

The subsequent weeks will still hold out the hope that a peaceful transition, a political process that brings all the actors together will lead to this country’s second free and transparent elections since January 2011. Is this “turmoil”, a word so often used, or, simply the difficult process of democratization in a nascent democracy?

Tunisia deserves special attention. It can still serve as a potential model for new democracies…assuredly, not a process that will be without many ups and downs to come. Imagine how Tunisians might view the U.S. Congress where a small, but extremist elected group of officials chose to bring an economic shutdown to the US government this week, rather than accept democratically negotiated and elected political platforms.

Regardless of what Tunisia’s newest round of political negotiations brings, Tunisians can be proud that they are sitting together and talking, as this is what lies at the heart of democracy. Let’s give Tunisia our support in continuing this process!

Jerry Sorkin is a longtime political observer, based in Tunis, Tunisia. He is Founder and President of TunisUSA, as well as a tourism consultant to organizations including The World Bank, The European Community and George Washington University program in Tourism Studies.

Mr. Sorkin was recently the featured speaker at the Commonwealth Club of CA on September 11, 2013

PAST EVENT:

The Tunisian Model of Revolution and the Challenges of Democracy:

http://www.commonwealthclub.org/events/2013-09-11/tunisian-model-revolution-and-challenges-democracy